Digital watermark pro5/5/2023 ![]() Probably the best tool on the market for this matter." What information can I trace with the watermark ? Traceability The tool is very powerful and proven to be effective to trace leaking sources. "Imatag is a subtle yet very powerful watermarking with and an effective reverse search (traitor detection tool). Imatag's watermark has been selected and is recommended by a famous smartphone manufacturer after strong quality tests on its product renders: That is how the patented solution of Imatag works. The watermark must be respectful of your images: by design, it modifies the value of some pixels, but it must not alter the quality of your content.Ī solution to avoid color drift is to use embed the watermark in luminance pixel values, and to use human perceptual model to hide the "noise" (modified pixels) in the high contrasts areas. Is the watermark really invisible ? Imperceptibility vs visual alterationsĪfter zooming, some watermarks become visible, for example in the form of a very annoying green "noise". Or trust professionals photographers who did it for you : Peta Pixel, DP Review, Fotostoppers. Test its robustness by yourself on our " challenge our technology" demo page to be convinced. Imatag's watermark is known to resist significant compression rates and image editing (resizing, filters, screenshots, print photos. But you should not sacrifice the quality of your images (see perception paragraph below) for the sake of traceability. In fact they transfer their problem to you: it's up to you to put the cursor on the "lifetime" side or on the "quality" side. They use to propose a trade between perceptibility and robustness to face this problem. Mainstream watermarks are easily defeated by the jpeg compression systematically used on many websites and platforms (social networks, marketplaces. Here are the main selection criteria for a professional-grade watermarking software : Will the watermark still be detected after all alterations of the image on the web ? Robustness to compression If your company has the same requirements and your are in the process of choosing a watermark software, then make sure that all these features are available and test them. Seamless integration of the watermarking process into an existing workflow.No-brainer interoperability with existing system,.Need to identify different copies of a single image (multiple marking),.In the end, most companies - disappointed by these poorly challenged legacy providers - gave up their solutions because they do not meet their main constraints, which are : When they need to select a watermark software, most integrators and vendors have turned to the few early market solutions, who became monopolistic. our article " 6 examples of uses of digital watermarking"). This technology is not new and is used in various industries (cf. though two images look identical, being able to tell which one corresponds to a certain transaction) ![]() identifying different copies of a single image (i.e.certify that similar image found by visual recognition is not a false positive.□ Download our Guide to select your Digital Watermark solution Why you finally broke up with legacy providersĪs shown in previous article " How not to lose sight of your images ?", digital watermarking is necessary when image recognition solutions are not able to provide the following information : What is the effort to integrate a watermarking processes into my workflow ?.Will watermarking or detection process congest my workflow ?.What information can I trace with the watermark ?.Will the watermark still be detected after various alterations of the image on the web ?.Quick read : Questions to ask to your vendor while assessing a digital watermarking solution : We provide at the end a grid with selection criteria. What are the most important selection criteria for watermarking software ? In this article, you will get a list of questions to ask while assessing a digital watermarking solution, depending on your existing system and your company needs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |